The Internationalisation of Law
Show Less

The Internationalisation of Law

Legislating, Decision-Making, Practice and Education

Edited by Mary Hiscock and William van Caenegem

This insightful book explores the acute challenges presented by the ‘internationalisation’ of law, a trend that has been accelerated by the growing requirement for academics and practitioners to work and research across countries and regions with differing legal traditions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: The Importance of International Developments in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: Kadi and the Autonomy of the EC Legal Order

Inge Govaere


Inge Govaere* INTRODUCTION In the United States of America (US), the debate is still ongoing as to whether and to what extent the Supreme Court could or should refer to foreign precedent, in particular in relation to constitutional matters such as the death penalty.1 In the European Union (EU), the Kadi case of 2008 in particular2 has triggered much controversy,3 thereby highlighting the opposite angle to a similar discussion. The focus of attention in Europe is namely to what extent the European Court of Justice (ECJ) could lawfully and rightfully refuse to plainly ‘surrender’ or to subordinate the European Community (EC) legal system to United Nations (UN) law and obligations when dealing with human rights issues. This question becomes all the more pertinent in view of the fact that, in the past, the ECJ has been rather receptive and constructive in forging interconnectivity between the EC legal order and international law developments. A benchmark in that respect was undoubtedly the Racke case of 1998,4 where the ECJ spelled out the necessity for the EC to respect international law with direct reference to a ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). This judgment, which was rendered ten years earlier than Kadi, equally concerned EC/ EU economic sanctions taken in implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions. A major question is therefore whether it is at all possible, and, if so, to determine how to reconcile those apparently conflicting judgments. The common denominator in all these discussions and developments appears...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.