The Internationalisation of Law
Show Less

The Internationalisation of Law

Legislating, Decision-Making, Practice and Education

Edited by Mary Hiscock and William van Caenegem

This insightful book explores the acute challenges presented by the ‘internationalisation’ of law, a trend that has been accelerated by the growing requirement for academics and practitioners to work and research across countries and regions with differing legal traditions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: The Influence of Scholarly Writing Upon the Courts in Europe

Pierre-Yves Gautier


Pierre-Yves Gautier* INTRODUCTION The role of legal scholars is the same everywhere, whether it be in Australia, in Europe, Singapore, Sweden or any other country. Legal scholars have two main roles: first, teaching students; and secondly, commenting on legal developments, in particular on judicial decisions and on legislation. As to the first role, innovation in teaching methodology is a pressing topic because the law has become progressively more complex, with a constant increase in regulations, statutes, treaties, jurisprudence and so forth. This is so everywhere, but European law is a particularly apt example of increased complexity. Because of this additional complexity, legal scholars must select the information, must underline what is important, and in particular the underlying principles. Our students should remember our lectures in the future, because of the clarity and focus on principle that we have brought to a given topic. Most important is also to teach law students legal method; in my view, which is a Cartesian view, everything is in the method.1 Thus teaching is a part of the harmonisation of law: sharing culture, methods, principles, and also sharing students. By these means our systems, civil law and common law, become more closely aligned. In our second core role as legal scholars, publishing commentaries on recent decisions of courts, and on statutes, we must use the same tools and methods: to analyse, explain, and criticise. We must endeavour to make and explain connections with other legal texts and writings, scholarly or jurisprudential. In these pursuits, of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.