The Internationalisation of Law
Show Less

The Internationalisation of Law

Legislating, Decision-Making, Practice and Education

Edited by Mary Hiscock and William van Caenegem

This insightful book explores the acute challenges presented by the ‘internationalisation’ of law, a trend that has been accelerated by the growing requirement for academics and practitioners to work and research across countries and regions with differing legal traditions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 15: The New York Convention as a Driving Force

Clyde Croft


Clyde Croft SC* INTRODUCTION We tend to think that we are living in a unique period of internationalisation or globalisation.1 It is true that there has never before been such accessibility to international air travel and communications, but this may be deceptive. In many respects we are, at least from a legal perspective, only now moving again to a period of internationalism. This has declined during the twentieth century for a variety of historical reasons, the exploration of which time does not permit. Nevertheless, an important factor seems to have been the rise of the nation state at the expense of former world empires or other transnational organisations. Global trading empires, such as the British Empire, provided coherent and co-ordinated legal systems throughout the world, together with some consistent legislative models, enforceability of judgments and court process available between different parts of the Empire and, of course, appeals to the one court, the Privy Council.2 Interestingly, it seems that as the commercial dominance and power of England rose throughout the nineteenth century, the readiness of the common law to accept settled rules of international law declined. So, in the latter part of the eighteenth century, ‘. . . if English law was silent, it was the opinion of both Lord Mansfield and Blackstone that a settled rule of international law must be considered to be part of English law, and enforced as such’.3 However, by the latter part of the nineteenth century a threshold question had been interposed – namely ‘whether the particular rule...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.