Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I
Show Less

Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I

Great Economists Since Petty and Boisguilbert

Edited by Gilbert Faccarello and Heinz D. Kurz

Volume I contains original biographical profiles of many of the most important and influential economists from the seventeenth century to the present day. These inform the reader about their lives, works and impact on the further development of the discipline. The emphasis is on their lasting contributions to our understanding of the complex system known as the economy. The entries also shed light on the means and ways in which the functioning of this system can be improved and its dysfunction reduced. Each Handbook can be read individually and acts as a self-contained volume in its own right. It can be purchased separately or as part of a three-volume set.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 29: John Stuart Mill (1806–1873)

Arrigo Opocher


The Fortunes of Mill John Stuart Mill’s fortunes as an economist varied substantially though time, and the assessment of his lasting contributions to economics is to some extent controversial. From the publication of his Principles (Mill 1848 [1965]) to about the end of his life in 1873, Mill was the unrivalled authority of economic theory both for the general public and the scientific community, similar to what Adam Smith had been until the advent of Malthus and Ricardo. During his lifetime, his treatise was published in seven “library editions” (and one successful “People’s edition”), promptly translated into the main European languages, and printed for the US public. Worldwide, “it rapidly eclipsed in popular favor the preceding treatises” (Mitchell 1967: 573), becoming “the most successful treatise of the period [between 1790 and 1870]” (Schumpeter, 1954: 527) and “probably the longest-lived textbook our discipline has ever had or ever will have” (Viner 1949: 380). It also marked an epoch for the scientific community: for a quarter of a century it was the basis of the apprenticeship of “most . . . English economists” (Marshall 1876 [1925]: 119) and was responsible for “the greatest triumphs of the classical political economy in the applied fields” (Hayek, 1934: vi). The “marginal revolution” challenged and eventually overcame Mill’s intellectual domain. Jevons (1871: vi) openly claimed that “authority was on the wrong side” and, in 1875–76, he warned his students at Owens College, Manchester, that “Mill’s Political Economy is disfigured by a series of fallacies” (Jevons, 1977: 3). Jevons,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.