Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I
Show Less

Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I

Great Economists Since Petty and Boisguilbert

Edited by Gilbert Faccarello and Heinz D. Kurz

Volume I contains original biographical profiles of many of the most important and influential economists from the seventeenth century to the present day. These inform the reader about their lives, works and impact on the further development of the discipline. The emphasis is on their lasting contributions to our understanding of the complex system known as the economy. The entries also shed light on the means and ways in which the functioning of this system can be improved and its dysfunction reduced. Each Handbook can be read individually and acts as a self-contained volume in its own right. It can be purchased separately or as part of a three-volume set.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 65: Arthur Spiethoff (1873–1957)

David Haas


The German economist Arthur Spiethoff was born in Düsseldorf in 1873. He studied economics and politics in Berlin and was an assistant of Gustav Schmoller between 1899 and 1908. In 1905 he received a PhD for his work on economic crises. After finishing his habilitation in 1907 Spiethoff became full professor at the German University of Prague in 1908. From 1918 until his retirement in 1939 he was professor at the University of Bonn. Arthur Spiethoff died in 1957 in Tübingen. On Spiefhoff ’s life and academic record, see Clausing (1958) and Kamp (1969). Arthur Spiethoff is known for his work on economic methodology and business cycles. In the History of Economic Analysis Joseph A. Schumpeter notes that Spiethoff is one of “most eminent members” of “a ‘youngest’ historical school” and that “[t]he international reputation of Arthur Spiethoff . . . rests upon his outstanding performance in the field of business cycle research” (Schumpeter 1954: 815–16). Between Spiethoff and Schumpeter there is both a personal and intellectual connection. As noted by Kurz (2013), they were not only friends but also shared similar methodological positions. Schumpeter was influenced by what Spiethoff termed “historical” or “observational theory”. Observational theory building starts with empirical and historical investigations of the phenomenon under consideration in order to identify and isolate its essential regularities. Then it tries to provide a causal explanation of the essential regularities using theoretical concepts and tools (see Spiethoff 2002a: 109–12). In his later methodological work, Spiethoff further aimed at...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.