Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I
Show Less

Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I

Great Economists Since Petty and Boisguilbert

Edited by Gilbert Faccarello and Heinz D. Kurz

Volume I contains original biographical profiles of many of the most important and influential economists from the seventeenth century to the present day. These inform the reader about their lives, works and impact on the further development of the discipline. The emphasis is on their lasting contributions to our understanding of the complex system known as the economy. The entries also shed light on the means and ways in which the functioning of this system can be improved and its dysfunction reduced. Each Handbook can be read individually and acts as a self-contained volume in its own right. It can be purchased separately or as part of a three-volume set.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 85: Edward Hastings Chamberlin (1899–1967)

Rodolfo Signorino


Edward Hastings Chamberlin was an American economist. He was born in La Conner, Washington, on 18 May 1899, and died in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on 16 July 1967. His book, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, and Joan Robinson’s The Theory of Imperfect Competition, both published in 1933, are unanimously acknowledged as the two path-breaking contributions that paved the way to the (so-called) imperfect/ monopolistic competition revolution, whose basic aim was freeing economic analysis from the straitjacket of perfect competition theory. Insomuch as it was presented as a revolution in microeconomic theory – on a par with the almost contemporaneous Keynesian revolution in macroeconomic theory – the monopolistic competition literature of the 1930s–1950s was a revolution that failed to dethrone perfect competition from its privileged status within economics (Tsoulfidis 2009). Yet, taking the clue from Dixit and Stiglitz (1977), a second wave of monopolistic competition literature has blossomed with much more profound impact on various quarters of economic analysis such as international trade, macroeconomics, growth theory and economic geography (Brakman and Hijdra 2004). While Joan Robinson soon lost any interest in the subject, Chamberlin devoted his entire intellectual life to (1) report and rectify (what he considered to be) “misconceptions” of his own theory and (2) differentiate his own contribution from that of his Cambridge (UK) counterpart. At least on this latter point, his efforts were largely ineffective: Kaldor’s scathing remark – “Professor Chamberlin has fallen a victim to the general tendency among producers in an imperfectly competitive market – a tendency he so convincingly...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.