New Directions in Social Impact Assessment
Show Less

New Directions in Social Impact Assessment

Conceptual and Methodological Advances

Edited by Frank Vanclay and Ana Maria Esteves

This important new book outlines current developments in thinking in the field of Social Impact Assessment (SIA). It advances the theory and practice of SIA, and argues that a dramatic shift is required in the way socioeconomic studies and community participation is undertaken. The book emphasizes that, much more than the act of predicting impacts in a regulatory context, SIA needs to be the process of managing the social aspects of development and that there needs to be a holistic and integrated approach to impact assessment. It stresses that greater attention needs to be given to ensuring that the goals of development are attained and enhanced.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Theoretical Foundations

Richard Howitt


Richard Howitt Introduction Social impact assessment (SIA) is meant to change the world (Vanclay, 2003a, 2003b). This is no naïve or idealized aspiration; rather, it is a practical observation of exactly what SIA is intended to do. SIA is undertaken to understand processes of social change, to predict how they will play out in real-world settings, and to manage and respond to the sources and consequences of change towards explicit – and often hotly contested – goals. It generally addresses social change at local and regional scales and, at its best, offers a coherent framework for understanding key institutions, relationships and connections in a particular social context in ways that facilitate creative and constructive engagement with issues of power, culture, place, participation, difference and community – all current key issues in the contemporary social sciences. These central concerns of SIA fuel major conceptual and theoretical debates in the social science disciplines that contribute to SIA, including anthropology, cultural studies, economics, environmental and social psychology, human geography, philosophy, political science and sociology. Yet explicit theoretical discourse is quite rare in the SIA literature (cf. Dietz, 1987; Becker, 2003). Instead, the literature has typically focused on questions of method rather than theory, and techniques rather than concepts. Practitioners from various disciplines have reflected big ideas from their own disciplines in their work, but rarely pursued wider discussion of the theoretical foundations for SIA. SIA is what Raymond Williams described as ‘an area where several disciplines converge, but in general do not meet’ (1983, p....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.