New Directions in Social Impact Assessment
Show Less

New Directions in Social Impact Assessment

Conceptual and Methodological Advances

Edited by Frank Vanclay and Ana Maria Esteves

This important new book outlines current developments in thinking in the field of Social Impact Assessment (SIA). It advances the theory and practice of SIA, and argues that a dramatic shift is required in the way socioeconomic studies and community participation is undertaken. The book emphasizes that, much more than the act of predicting impacts in a regulatory context, SIA needs to be the process of managing the social aspects of development and that there needs to be a holistic and integrated approach to impact assessment. It stresses that greater attention needs to be given to ensuring that the goals of development are attained and enhanced.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: Environmental Conflict Mediation

Rauno Sairinen


Rauno Sairinen Introduction Conflicts have long been viewed as undesirable in societal planning and decision making. This has also been the case in environmental matters. The problematic relationship between the environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainability is increasingly recognized within the environmental policy and impact assessment communities. Environmental conflicts frequently cause severe problems for planning, decision making and legal institutions, private sector developments and local communities. Planning timetables can become very long and expensive, and local communities can suffer from uncertainties and adversarial conditions. Hence, it is not surprising that contemporary planning theories regard conflict as a problem and have introduced methods of reducing conflict (Persson, 2006). However, it is clear that environmental conflicts are here to stay. Society consists of people with differing interests and values, which inevitably lead to various conflicts. However, conflict may also lead to positive outcomes. The target is no longer how to avoid conflict, but how to handle it. Decision making in environmental conflict situations requires a major shift in governance. This entails choices and discussions about anticipation instead of control, societal versus technocratic approaches, collaborative versus hierarchical processes, and communication as mutual learning instead of communication to explain (Sairinen et al., 2010). Looking at the spectrum of available planning and evaluation methods, it is important for planners, managers, engineers and decision makers to know how a chosen method will affect conflict situations. In environmental-related conflicts, the relationship between impact assessment (IA) practices and conflict mediation/resolution is of interest. The complex relationship between...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.