Comparative Tort Law
Show Less

Comparative Tort Law

Global Perspectives

Edited by Mauro Bussani and Anthony J. Sebok

Comparative Tort Law: Global Perspectives provides a framework for analyzing and understanding the current state of tort law in most of the world's legal systems. The book examines tort law theories, rules and cultures. It looks at general issues at play throughout the globe, such as causation, economic and non-economic damages, product and professional liability, as well as the relationship between tort law and crime, insurance, and public welfare schemes. The book also provides insightful case studies by analyzing specific features of selected tort systems in Europe, USA, Latin America, East Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: Tort law in Japan

Emi Matsumoto


The last chapter of the Book of Obligations (Chapter 5, Book 3) of the Japanese Civil Code of 1898, which is in force today, concerns the law of torts. While the Code adopts the Pandectist plan and was greatly influenced by the drafts of the BGB (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, German civil code of 1900), the rules laid down in the 16 articles (709–724) of the chapter include a healthy dose of French law. Also, the common law was not entirely excluded as a model (Article 716). The compilers of the Code explicitly stated that the courts adjust the law in this area to the changing society. The contribution of the courts to the development of the law has been particularly important in this branch of law. It is noteworthy that not only the Supreme Court, but also the lower courts have been creative in their judgments, and that the judges sometimes ‘deviate from the wording of statutory law rather than adhering to the literal interpretation of the statutes’. The Japanese law of torts originally comprised various elements imported from different countries. These elements comprised the texts of the Code, and were thus much elaborated upon by the courts. In this chapter, the marked characteristics of the law of torts are examined from two perspectives: the mixed nature of the law, on the one hand, and some unique developments which may constitute a certain originality of Japanese tort law in comparative aspects, on the other.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.