Handbook of Creative Cities
Show Less

Handbook of Creative Cities

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by David Emanuel Andersson, Åke E. Andersson and Charlotta Mellander

With the publication of The Rise of the Creative Class by Richard Florida in 2002, the ‘creative city’ became the new hot topic among urban policymakers, planners and economists. Florida has developed one of three path-breaking theories about the relationship between creative individuals and urban environments. The economist Åke E. Andersson and the psychologist Dean Simonton are the other members of this ‘creative troika’. In the Handbook of Creative Cities, Florida, Andersson and Simonton appear in the same volume for the first time. The expert contributors in this timely Handbook extend their insights with a varied set of theoretical and empirical tools. The diversity of the contributions reflect the multidisciplinary nature of creative city theorizing, which encompasses urban economics, economic geography, social psychology, urban sociology, and urban planning. The stated policy implications are equally diverse, ranging from libertarian to social democratic visions of our shared creative and urban future.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 14: The Creative Potential of Network Cities

David F. Batten

Extract

14 The creative potential of network cities David F. Batten Some creative regions in the world consist of a functionally cohesive web of not-toodistant settlements. Classic examples are Randstad Holland and the Kansai region of Japan (Figure 14.1). Other polycentric urban agglomerations are appearing in North America, such as New Mexico’s Technology Triangle (T2) clustered around Albuquerque, Santa Fe and Los Alamos. Have these urban agglomerations formed because the suburban boundaries of nearby cities and towns have simply spread outwards and almost bumped into each other? Do the more creative ones possess unique economic, cultural and infrastructural properties that provide them with key comparative advantages over their monocentric rivals? Does each settlement in these urban networks gain from dynamic synergies, such as reciprocal growth (through co-operative knowledge exchange) and the shared benefits of complementarity and creativity. Perhaps there are other explanations? In some earlier papers, I referred to these phenomena as ‘network cities’ because of the dynamic, networking process by which their polycentric structure evolved.1 To a large extent, this process was one of concentrated deconcentration. I called them network cities to avoid using the term ‘polycentric’. The problem with ‘polycentric’ is that it can refer to intra-urban clusters of population and economic activity – such as in London, Paris or Los Angeles, for example – or to interurban patterns – as in the Dutch Randstad or Japan’s Kansai region (for more a more detailed discussion, see Davidi, 2003; Parr, 2004). Most large cities are polycentric. Since my focus was only on interurban...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.