International Science and Technology Cooperation in a Globalized World
Show Less

International Science and Technology Cooperation in a Globalized World

The External Dimension of the European Research Area

Edited by Heiko Prange-Gstöhl

In a globalized knowledge-economy, the European Union (EU) needs a new approach to its international science and technology (S & T) policies by focusing on improved coherence across the different tiers of government and by demonstrating leadership in tackling serious global challenges. The contributors to this book analyze European S & T policies in several areas of global concern as well as by exposing both the pitfalls of policy coordination and its potential to contribute to a more coherent international S & T policy. They highlight the interactions between national, European and international policies, and explore how a common European policy for international S & T cooperation could work, and under which conditions. The book concludes that an EU external S & T policy is more likely to emerge if member states and the European Commission focus on a limited number of strategic priorities where Europe really can make a difference.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: The Organization of Policy Coordination in Multi-level Spaces: Implications for EU International S & T Policy

Robert Kaiser


10. The organization of policy coordination in multi-level spaces: implications for EU international S&T policy Robert Kaiser INTRODUCTION: NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE POLICY COORDINATION IN MULTI-LEVEL SPACES In systems of multi-level governance, policy actors are likely to coordinate their activities within horizontal or vertical policy networks1 if they are convinced that ‘a sharing of tasks and responsibilities’ or ‘doing things together instead of doing them alone’ (Kooiman 1993, p. 1) would be beneficial both for participating actors as well as for public welfare. Policy networks have spread within the European system of multi-level governance because policy coordination within networks seems to be the most effective mechanism for the management of interdependencies if alternative modes of coordination are either not at hand (for example top-down hierarchical order by the highest political level) or if they are considered to be not appropriate (for example competition for the best solution which would produce winners and losers). Indeed, network arrangements seem to combine the advantages of competitive and hierarchical coordination without incurring their respective deficits. Networks offer more flexibility than hierarchies if they are able to produce an added value or solutions for commonly shared problems, which can be implemented by actors who preserve their autonomy. Therefore, it can be assumed that the most challenging aspect of the organization of policy coordination within multi-level policy networks is not only the definition of commonly shared problems or possible added values, but also the determination of the degree of the actors’ autonomy as well as the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.