Methods of Comparative Law
Show Less

Methods of Comparative Law

Edited by Pier Giuseppe Monateri

Methods of Comparative Law brings to bear new thinking on topics including: the mutual relationship between space and law; the plot that structures legal narratives, identities and judicial interpretations; a strategic approach to legal decision making; and the inner potentialities of the ‘comparative law and economics’ approach to the field. Together, the contributors reassess the scientific understanding of comparative methodologies in the field of law in order to provide both critical insights into the traditional literature and an original overview of the most recent and purposive trends.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Comparison as Deep Appreciation

Gary Watt


Gary Watt* In his 1949 article on ‘The Field of Comparative Law’, F.H. Lawson wrote that comparative law is ‘bound to be superficial’.1 Some years later Alan Watson acknowledged that superficiality will always remain a peril in comparative law scholarship.2 What counts as superficiality? Can we avoid it, and if so, how? An answer lies somewhere in the ongoing debate on the significance of culture in comparative law. I hesitate to call it a ‘lively’ debate for we will see that the rival camps have lately established somewhat lodged positions and that the discourse between them is in danger of becoming as sterile as the no man’s land between warring trenches. On the one side there are scholars who argue that deep comparative law requires us to appreciate law in its cultural context, and specifically in the context of cultures, including those of the artist and artisan, which do not carry the label ‘legal’. Pierre Legrand stands at the vanguard of that camp. On the other side there are scholars who are content to compare laws in the context of legal cultures and legal histories, but see no necessary connection between historically-created laws and the wider culture in which those laws now reside. Alan Watson is the doyen of that view. Perhaps there are still those who do not think that culture exerts any influence at all on the practice and progress of laws. Strict adherents to law and economics might, for instance, argue...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.