Methods of Comparative Law
Show Less

Methods of Comparative Law

Edited by Pier Giuseppe Monateri

Methods of Comparative Law brings to bear new thinking on topics including: the mutual relationship between space and law; the plot that structures legal narratives, identities and judicial interpretations; a strategic approach to legal decision making; and the inner potentialities of the ‘comparative law and economics’ approach to the field. Together, the contributors reassess the scientific understanding of comparative methodologies in the field of law in order to provide both critical insights into the traditional literature and an original overview of the most recent and purposive trends.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: The Functional Method

James Gordley


James Gordley 1. INTRODUCTION If you mention the functional method to a comparative lawyer, the first text he may think of is Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, by Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kötz,1 translated by Tony Weir as An Introduction to Comparative Law.2 According to the authors, ‘[t]he basic method of all comparative law is that of functionality’.3 Yet they distrusted discussions of that method.4 Indeed, as Ralf Michaels noted, despite much discussion by others, ‘as a theory [the functional method] hardly exists …’.5 In practice, moreover, one finds a ‘methodological mishmash’.6 Yet many comparative lawyers accept some form of the functional method.7 The reason is not that its theoretical foundations are clear and compelling. The reason is that they find it helps them to make sense of some of the similarities and differences among different legal systems. As Michaels said, ‘[o]ne reason for the methodological mishmash in comparative law is that the founders of the comparative method were more pragmatically than methodologically interested’.8 That statement implies that, on a pragmatic level, comparative lawyers have found that by using the method, they arrive at results they respect. In this chapter, instead of first considering the efforts that have been made to describe or explain the functional method, we will look at an example of the method at work. The example, picked arbitrarily from many others, will be Arthur von Mehren’s discussion of the doctrine of offer and acceptance. It is not, of course, a salient doctrine...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.