Methods of Comparative Law
Show Less

Methods of Comparative Law

  • Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Pier Giuseppe Monateri

Methods of Comparative Law brings to bear new thinking on topics including: the mutual relationship between space and law; the plot that structures legal narratives, identities and judicial interpretations; a strategic approach to legal decision making; and the inner potentialities of the ‘comparative law and economics’ approach to the field. Together, the contributors reassess the scientific understanding of comparative methodologies in the field of law in order to provide both critical insights into the traditional literature and an original overview of the most recent and purposive trends.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Interstitium and Non-law

Peter Goodrich

Extract

JOBNAME: Monateri PAGE: 3 SESS: 5 OUTPUT: Mon May 28 12:22:31 2012 10. Interstitium and non-law Peter Goodrich* Modern law is understood overwhelmingly as a structure. The English jurist Blackstone nicely coined the term establishment to describe not simply the legal status quo ante, institute and institutions, but also the implicit desirability of observing and obeying our directors, priests, professors, judges and lawyers. Legal structure connotes hierarchy and the accompanying beneficence of the invisible, of sources both absent and above. The sovereign (super-anus), after all, is one who sits above and it is that feature of distance and overlooking, of detachment and supervision that best captures the innately modernist legal drive to abstraction and universality, to a law in nubibus, which aerial and absconded being so troubles and exercises the comparative lawyer. The longue durée of nomos is paradoxically the narrative of a trajectory towards virtuality. The paradox lies in the fact that, as Vico observed, nomos was originally of the earth and catalogued appropriation, division, locality and difference rather than the extraterritoriality and angelology that Roman jurisprudence cunningly flung to the Western mob. Law as corpus, the Latin body, norm as institution and personality – aetas, scientia, mores et ordo in the Anglican ecclesiastical vocabulary – signifies geometrical measure and general rule, doctrine and universality, axiom and order rather than corporeality, place and comparison. If there is a modus, a method and melody to the angst of comparative law, a theme that conjoins the grand and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.