Methods of Comparative Law
Show Less

Methods of Comparative Law

Edited by Pier Giuseppe Monateri

Methods of Comparative Law brings to bear new thinking on topics including: the mutual relationship between space and law; the plot that structures legal narratives, identities and judicial interpretations; a strategic approach to legal decision making; and the inner potentialities of the ‘comparative law and economics’ approach to the field. Together, the contributors reassess the scientific understanding of comparative methodologies in the field of law in order to provide both critical insights into the traditional literature and an original overview of the most recent and purposive trends.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: The Resilience of History: Comparative Legal Theory and the End of the American Century

Anthony Louis Marasco


Anthony Louis Marasco When in 1989 the Cold War all but ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall, many believed the world to have entered a lasting new era of peace and prosperity. Among them was Francis Fukuyama, who famously ventured to predict the end of history that year. What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, or the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such: that is, the end point of mankind’s ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.1 What followed, however, had more to do with the resilience of history than with the end of historical time. Some notorious authoritarian regimes evolved into ‘rogue states’, waging unnerving wars of attrition, while so-called ‘non-state actors’ began perpetrating nationgrade acts of murder, extending the reach of terrorism well beyond any scale previously known. Under these new strains, even the time-honored machine of democracy started having trouble keeping up with the tilt of the times. Our age seems now an age of endless transition, one of those periods in which uncertainty prevails. So looking back, a question presents itself: have we really missed a historic opportunity to get things right (if not forever, at least for the foreseeable future)? Or was it all a misunderstanding from the start? In what follows, I will argue that, in spite of all ideological exaggeration, some of it quite flagrant, a...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.