Regional and Urban Policy and Planning on the Korean Peninsula
Show Less

Regional and Urban Policy and Planning on the Korean Peninsula

Chang-Hee Christine Bae and Harry W. Richardson

The potential for reunification of the two Koreas, whether in the short or long term, argues for a comprehensive look at policy and planning issues that encompass the peninsula as a whole. This book deals with spatial policy issues in both South and North Korea in a broad and non-political way.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Balanced National Development

Harry W. Richardson

Extract

8. Balanced national development Harry W. Richardson INTRODUCTION This chapter has several major findings: the dominance of Seoul in the South Korean economy and the persistence of unbalanced spatial growth can partially be explained by the principles of the New Economic Geography (NEG); the goal of balanced national development is difficult if not impossible, and may not even be desirable; preserving and building upon the Seoul Capital Region’s role is critically important (despite the problems that its huge size, congestion and soaring house prices create); and a government office dispersal strategy, whatever its merits, is an overly simplistic solution to the complexities of regional and urban policies. Although the concept of the NEG is usually traced to Krugman (1991), there is little that is new about NEG. The concepts were already embedded in the literature. Examples include: increasing returns to scale, transport costs, distance decay, cumulative causation, space and imperfect competition, centripetal and centrifugal forces, interregional vs. international trade. However, Krugman combined them into a formal model, which permitted him to derive multiple equilibria under different conditions. These were obtained via numerical solutions because Krugman never carried out any empirical work. Nevertheless, the NEG has some value in explaining the economic history of South Korea in general and the Seoul Metropolitan Area in particular. Strong increasing returns to scale, building upon initial advantages, reinforced the economic dominance of Seoul and outweighed any benefits associated with a more dispersed pattern of economic activity. This was also facilitated by low transport costs...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.