Climate Change Liability
Show Less

Climate Change Liability

Edited by Michael Faure and Marjan Peeters

This book sheds new light on the growing issue of using liability as a tool for both preventing and compensating for the damage caused by climate change. Michael Faure and Marjan Peeters have brought together a selection of expert contributors who explore a variety of both national and European perspectives on the topic.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Liability for Climate Change-Related Damage in Domestic Courts: Claims for Compensation in the USA

Elena Kosolapova


1 Elena Kosolapova INTRODUCTION 1. The past decade has seen a rise in national climate change litigation worldwide. Notably, until today, no greenhouse gas emitter has been found liable for climate change by any domestic court. In accordance with the relief sought by plaintiffs, climate change case law can be roughly organised into three categories: (1) claims related to procedural injury; (2) claims for injunctive and/or declaratory relief; and (3) claims for compensation. In addressing procedural, and not actual, injury, procedural justice does not offer any immediate relief to plaintiffs already suffering from injurious effects of climate change. Injunctive relief – a court order requiring a party to do, or to refrain from doing, certain acts – is a form of relief ultimately related to climate change mitigation due to its preventive character; it is unhelpful in cases concerned with the dangerous effects of climate change that have already taken place. Thus, compensation claims become relevant when adaptation to and remediation of the already happening climate change is at stake. Climate change-related compensation claims are the focus of this chapter. After a brief introduction (section 2.1), sections 2.2 to 2.4 summarize compensation claims adjudicated thus far worldwide, all three of which have been brought in the United States. The United States remains the only developed country without a mitigation policy based on the 1997 Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and given its common law litigation tradition, it is not surprising that it is in the US...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.