Payments for Environmental Services, Forest Conservation and Climate Change
Show Less

Payments for Environmental Services, Forest Conservation and Climate Change

Livelihoods in the REDD?

Edited by Luca Tacconi, Sango Mahanty and Helen Suich

This resourceful book draws on several case studies to derive implications for the design of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) schemes that are very relevant to current climate change negotiations and the implementation of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD) schemes at the national level. With its focus on livelihoods, the book also provides important lessons that are relevant to the design of PES schemes focusing on environmental services other than carbon conservation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Poor Household Participation in Payments for Environmental Services in Nicaragua and Colombia

Ana R. Rios and Stefano Pagiola


Ana R. Rios and Stefano Pagiola INTRODUCTION The Regional Integrated Silvopastoral Ecosystem Management Project, implemented at sites in Colombia, Nicaragua and Costa Rica from 2003 to 2008, offers an excellent opportunity to examine the ability of poor households to participate in Payments for Environmental Services (PES). The Silvopastoral Project used PES to stimulate the adoption of silvopastoral practices in degraded pastures by paying participating households for the biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration services that were generated, with financing from the Global Environment Facility (GEF). Unlike many other PES schemes, the Silvopastoral Project offered a wide range of participation options, ranging from simple and inexpensive land-use changes to substantial and complex changes (with correspondingly higher payments). That some of the choices offered by the project are complex and onerous provides a particularly strong test of poorer households’ ability to participate. In this chapter, we evaluate the extent to which poor households were able to participate in the Silvopastoral Project’s PES scheme, using data from two of its sites. As the same payment scheme was offered in both areas, we are able to compare poor household’s participation in PES under different agronomic and socioeconomic conditions. In particular, one site is characterized by high levels of poverty, with most households falling below the poverty line, and many below the extreme poverty line, while the other site exhibits a very wide range of income levels, including both extremely poor and very wealthy farm households. Because of the nature of the practices being promoted, the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.