Inverse Infrastructures
Show Less

Inverse Infrastructures

Disrupting Networks from Below

Edited by Tineke M. Egyedi and Donna C. Mehos

The notion of inverse infrastructures – that is, bottom-up, user-driven, self-organizing networks – gives us a fresh perspective on the omnipresent infrastructure systems that support our economy and structure our way of living. This fascinating book considers the emergence of inverse infrastructures as a new phenomenon that will have a vast impact on consumers, industry and policy. Using a wide range of theories, from institutional economics to complex adaptive systems, it explores the mechanisms and incentives for the rise of these alternatives to large-scale infrastructures and points to their potential disruptive effect on conventional markets and governance models.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Inverse Telecommunications: The Future for Rural Areas in Developing Countries?

Rudi Westerveld


Rudi Westerveld INTRODUCTION Access to telecommunication technologies in developing countries, particularly in rural areas, is often poor. Incumbent operators lack interest in this market, where profits are low and infrastructure maintenance difficult. Moreover, past operator-driven efforts have not been successful. This makes it difficult to envisage how telecommunications and information technologies (ICTs) should play the catalyzing role in the economic development of rural areas in developing countries, something for which the United Nations is hoping (UN 2008). The question posed in this chapter is whether ‘inverse’ telecommunication infrastructures, that is, bottom-up, self-organized, user-driven and decentralized developments (Egyedi et al. 2007), could at least partly fill this gap in service provision. Could inverse initiatives play a pre-eminent role in providing access to telecommunication and Internet services, thereby contributing to the economic development of rural areas? Could they succeed where operatordriven initiatives did not? The question has a high relevance, as the below news items about the Dabba initiative illustrate (Box 10.1). They describe a serious conflict between an incumbent operator (Telkom) and a bottom-up telecom initiative (Dabba) in South Africa. Apparently, in the period concerned, Dabba’s initiative is starting to take off and harm the established interests of Telkom. The news items accuse Telkom of calling in the help of the South African regulatory authority (ICASA) to block Dabba’s inverse infrastructure developments. The news items mention the lack of affordable telecommunication provisions in an area relatively close to Johannesburg. This lack of access is even worse in the more rural and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.