Smart Leadership for Higher Education in Difficult Times
Show Less

Smart Leadership for Higher Education in Difficult Times

Edited by David W. Breneman and Paul J. Yakoboski

As the US economy emerges from the severest recession in a generation, large questions regarding its long-term ramifications for higher education remain unanswered. In fact, the harshest effects of the economic downturn are likely ahead as campus leadership focuses on enrollment, affordability and fundraising. This volume of essays examines the challenges and opportunities for advancing higher education’s core missions of education, research and service in a resource-constrained environment.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Leading in a Changing Environment

Kent John Chabotar


Kent John Chabotar FORESEEING THE FUTURE Predicting the future for higher education is an enterprise loaded with danger and risk. In 2006, if someone had told you what we would face in 2009, you would have had that person put in a straightjacket immediately. But despite the uncertainty, I will venture some observations although they hardly qualify as forecasts. First, tuition and fees will continue to be the number one source of revenue for private colleges and universities (no surprise there). Tuition may in fact go up as a percent of total revenue, not because colleges and universities continue the six to ten percent increases of the past, but because other sources of revenue grow more slowly, as will budgets. Current downward pressure on higher education budgets are unprecedented. When the budget is basically staying the same, even small increases in tuition will start to increase the percentage being drawn from tuition and fees. Second, we will see increased tuition discounting, particularly funded (as opposed to unfunded) discounting. When I arrived at Bowdoin College as chief financial officer in 1991, endowments funded 75 cents of every dollar granted in financial aid. Eleven years later, only 50 percent of Bowdoin’s discounting was covered by endowment funds, with the rest unfunded except by the operating budget. At Guilford College, the unfunded figure is 88 percent. As noted by Jane Wellman (Chapter 12), there are highly selective medallion schools that discount to promote accessibility and non-medallion schools that discount to ensure a student...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.