Comparative Law and Society
Show Less

Comparative Law and Society

Edited by David S. Clark

Comparative Law and Society, part of the Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series, is a pioneering volume that comprises 19 original essays written by expert authors from across the world. This innovative handbook offers both a history of the field of comparative law and society and a thorough exploration of its methods, disciplines, and major issues, presenting the most comprehensive look into this contemporary field to date.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Comparative Sociology of Law

Roger Cotterrell


Roger Cotterrell* 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION The Scope of Comparison Comparison seems basic to understanding. Deciding what is similar or different as between two or more things makes it possible to give them identity within a larger framework; to recognise their particular place in an environment of the familiar and the unfamiliar. Comparing happens all the time, but often unsystematically—by observing, recognising and differentiating impressionistically. Sometimes comparison is a way of seeking similarity. To find that something newly discovered is, in important respects, the same as what one already knows can be very reassuring. It affirms knowledge already possessed, suggesting that that knowledge has a wider application than had previously been realised. Comparison undertaken for this purpose tends to validate existing understandings. There might even be an incentive to work towards removing remaining perceived differences and emphasising commonalities. The tendency may be to see apparent differences as superficial, temporary or based on misunderstandings that can be removed.1 However, sometimes the aim of comparison is to appreciate difference, to value it specially, because it can be salutary to realise that things—for example, legal and social ideas and arrangements—do not have to take the forms that are already familiar to the observer. In appreciating difference, it becomes possible to see that the world and its experiences can be ordered and understood in many different ways. Familiar ways are not necessarily confirmed as the best. One can learn from others, or just see that ‘the best’ may be relative to time...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.