Comparative Law and Society
Show Less

Comparative Law and Society

Edited by David S. Clark

Comparative Law and Society, part of the Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series, is a pioneering volume that comprises 19 original essays written by expert authors from across the world. This innovative handbook offers both a history of the field of comparative law and society and a thorough exploration of its methods, disciplines, and major issues, presenting the most comprehensive look into this contemporary field to date.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Federalism and Subnational Legal Systems: The Canadian Example of Provincial Constitutionalism

G. Alan Tarr


G. Alan Tarr* 1 INTRODUCTION Scholars have long recognized that studying the constitutional architecture of other countries enhances one’s understanding of one’s own constitutional arrangements by making the familiar and seemingly obvious problematic and contingent. As Kim Scheppele put it: ‘One reason [for studying comparative constitutionalism] is that many of the taken-for-granted fixed starting points of our field are actually variables connected to time and space, variables whose variable quality is obscured if we do not know the counterexamples.’1 With this in mind, this chapter analyzes provincial constitutionalism in Canada in light of American state constitutions and, to a lesser extent, the subnational constitutions of other federal systems. Such a study is valuable substantively, as previous research on Canadian constitutionalism has largely ignored provincial constitutions.2 In addition, looking at Canadian provincial constitutions from a comparative perspective highlights what is common and what distinctive in subnational constitutions in various federal systems. Finally, by examining Canadian provincial constitutionalism comparatively, this study reveals what these diverse experiences suggest about the role that subnational constitutions play in governance and in guaranteeing rights. This chapter pays particular attention to developments in Quebec, because the relation between provincial constitutions and rights has been a topic of more than scholarly interest in that province. The idea of a separate, entrenched Quebec constitution has periodically * Director of the Center for State Constitutional Studies and Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Rutgers University-Camden. The author began research on this chapter while he was a Fulbright scholar in Ottawa, Canada, and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.