The Handbook of Globalisation, Second Edition
Show Less

The Handbook of Globalisation, Second Edition

Edited by Jonathan Michie

With contributions from the leading commentators in the field and an over-arching introduction from the editor, the concerns of this updated and revised Handbook are two-fold. Firstly, to redefine the concept of globalisation and dispel the haze that surrounds it through a systematic and thorough examination of the debate. Secondly, to advance the frontiers of current critical thinking on the role and impact of globalisation, on the winners and losers in the process, and on the implications for society, the economy and governance.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 20: The Political Economy of the Third Way: The Relationship between Globalisation and National Economic Policy

Simon Lee


Simon Lee Introduction There have been few more important debates in the discipline of political economy in the modern era than those relating to the relationship between globalisation and national economic policy. Three principal perspectives have been advanced (Held et al., 2000). First, the ‘hyperglobalisers’ who have contended that globalisation has rendered national economic policy largely redundant (Ohmae, 1995). Second, the ‘sceptics’ for whom the notion of the powerless state has been exaggerated to the point of mythology (Hirst et al., 2009). Third, the ‘transformationalists’ for whom globalisation has unleashed an unprecedented period of social change upon states and societies (Blair, 1996; Giddens, 1998). These perspectives have been accompanied by a parallel discourse concerning the transition from government to governance in the relationship between the public and private, and the state and market, in the conduct of economic policy-making at all levels from the local to the global (Rodrik, 2007). The ideological context of these discourses has been a vigorous argument concerning the viability and legitimacy of the economic policy prescriptions of the neoliberal orthodoxy of the ‘Washington Consensus’ (Williamson, 1993; Serra and Stiglitz, 2009). On the one hand, the market fundamentalism of the ‘Washington Consensus’ has had its vigorous advocates, notably the former Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board (Greenspan, 2007). On the other hand, the likely dividend both for global growth and national economic development has been contested by academics (Hutton, 2002; Gamble, 2009), market economists and traders (Soros, 2008; Bootle, 2009), Nobel Prize winning economists (Sen,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.