More Common Ground for International Competition Law?
Show Less

More Common Ground for International Competition Law?

Edited by Josef Drexl, Warren S. Grimes, Clifford A. Jones, Rudolph J.R. Peritz and Edward T. Swaine

In recent years, an impressive proliferation of competition laws has been seen around the world. Whilst this development may lead to greater diversity of approaches, economic arguments may promote convergence. The contributions to this book look at a number of the most topical issues by asking whether the competition world is turning more towards convergence or diversity. These issues include, among others, the changing role of economics in times of economic crises and political change, the introduction of criminal sanctions, resale-price maintenance, unilateral conduct and the application of competition law to intellectual property and state-owned enterprises.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Resale Price Maintenance: A Reassessment of its Competitive Harms and Benefits

Marina Lao


5. Resale price maintenance: A reassessment of its competitive harms and benefits Marina Lao* INTRODUCTION 1 In a sharply divided five to four decision in Leegin Creative Products, Inc. v PSKS, Inc.,1 the US Supreme Court in 2007 overruled the nearly century-old precedent of Dr. Miles2 to end per se condemnation of resale price maintenance (RPM)3 in favor of a rule of reason analysis. But the case has hardly settled the debate on the economics of, or the appropriate legal treatment for, RPM. While some commentators view RPM as often procompetitive and Leegin as long overdue,4 others disagree with the majority’s decision.5 Indeed, bills were introduced in Congress to * I would like to thank Josef Drexl, Warren Grimes, Rudolph Peritz, Robert Steiner, Charles Sullivan and participants in the 2009 ASCOLA conference for helpful comments. Thanks are also due to Eric Wolf and especially Nicholas Dimakos (Seton Hall, Class of 2011) for excellent research assistance. 1 551 US 877, 127 S Ct 2705 (2007). 2 Dr. Miles Med. Co. v John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 US 373 (1911). 3 For convenience, unless otherwise specified, I use the term RPM without the qualifier ‘minimum’ to refer only to minimum resale price maintenance (not maximum RPM), since minimum RPM is the focus of this chapter. 4 See, e.g., B Klein, ‘Competitive Resale Price Maintenance in the Absence of Free-Riding’ (2009) 76 Antitrust LJ 431; JD Wright, ‘Overshot the Mark? A Simple Explanation of the Chicago School’s Influence on Antitrust’...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.