More Common Ground for International Competition Law?
Show Less

More Common Ground for International Competition Law?

Edited by Josef Drexl, Warren S. Grimes, Clifford A. Jones, Rudolph J.R. Peritz and Edward T. Swaine

In recent years, an impressive proliferation of competition laws has been seen around the world. Whilst this development may lead to greater diversity of approaches, economic arguments may promote convergence. The contributions to this book look at a number of the most topical issues by asking whether the competition world is turning more towards convergence or diversity. These issues include, among others, the changing role of economics in times of economic crises and political change, the introduction of criminal sanctions, resale-price maintenance, unilateral conduct and the application of competition law to intellectual property and state-owned enterprises.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: A Comparative Look at the Competition Law Control of State-owned Enterprises and Government in China

Deborah Healey


8. A comparative look at the competition law control of stateowned enterprises and government in China Deborah Healey INTRODUCTION 1 The enactment of a competition law in China in 2007 was a notable achievement in a number of respects. The process of lawmaking was lengthy: consultations were numerous and the approach changed many times. The Anti Monopoly Law (AML), operative 1 August 2008, prohibits monopoly conduct,1 which it defines as abuse of dominance,2 monopoly agreements3 and certain mergers and acquisitions,4 and shows the influences of both European and US competition laws. The fourth category of prohibition in the AML is, however, more unusual – the law prohibits the exploitation of administrative power, known in China as ‘administrative monopoly’.5 This chapter examines the application of the AML to government bodies and operations: state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and administrative monopoly. It outlines factors that are likely to influence the way the AML will be interpreted, particularly in relation to SOEs. It considers whether the picture is any clearer after more than a year of operation. 1 2 3 4 5 See Article 3. Chapter III. Chapter II. Chapter IV. Chapter V. 122 M2697 - DREXL TEXT.indd 122 22/08/2011 07:47 Competition law control of SOEs and government in China 123 2 2.1 THE STATE AND BUSINESS IN CHINA System Reform A very brief snapshot of the historical, economic, commercial and legal factors that form the background to the AML and are likely to influence its interpretation and application generally and in...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.