Economic Strategies for Mature Industrial Economies
Show Less

Economic Strategies for Mature Industrial Economies

Edited by Peter Karl Kresl

The global economy has transformed during the last few decades. Though the changes have benefited some, many mature industrial economies have not been treated well by the changes they have seen and have been forced to adapt to dramatically altered circumstances. In this collection of original papers, economists and geographers from Asia, North America and Europe examine the policy initiatives that have succeeded in their countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Economic Structure and Business Organization in the Central Region of Mexico

Jaime Sobrino


Jaime Sobrino INTRODUCTION: DIFFERENTIAL URBANIZATION AND METROPOLITAN REGIONS In 1993, a paper by Hermanaus Geyer and Thomas Kontuly appeared in the International Regional Science Review, the purpose of which was to propose a graphic and territorial model on the demographic performance of cities based on population size (Geyer and Kontuly, 1993). Based on the available literature until that date, and with some empirical exercises undertaken by themselves, they concluded that the model could be applied both to developed and developing countries. That model was called differential urbanization and assumed that the cities of a national urban system, divided according to population size, experience successive periods of high and low demographic growth. These differences in demographic growth are attributed to the pattern of migration flows that occur inside the nation. From a graphic perspective, the model of differential urbanization presents three phases: (i) primary city; (ii) polarization reversal, and (iii) counterurbanization (Figure 6.1). During the first phase, most of the population growth inside the urban system occurs in the main city, generally the capital of the country, where most of the population and of the national economic activity are concentrated. The second phase is when intermediate cities have a major rate of population growth, in relation to the primary city, and at the same time they work as alternative nodes for economic activity location; internal migration is not for the primary city but for intermediate urban areas. Finally, the third phase, counterurbanization, occurs when the smaller urban areas are the major...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.