Edited by Jan M. Smits
Chapter 14: Common law*
The expression ‘common law’ has a variety of meanings, but in the context of comparative law it is usually used to denominate the legal family or tradition associated with Anglo-American legal systems. In fact care must still be taken. First, the expression ‘common law’, if translated into Latin or French, will come to mean something very different; thus ius commune or droit commun are labels that will never mean the Anglo-American legal tradition. Secondly, the common law tradition encompasses more than the legal systems of England and the United States; most of the United Kingdom Commonwealth countries have legal systems belonging to the common law family. In addition to these two ambiguities, the expression ‘common law’ is used in English law to mean different things depending on the context within which it is employed. It may mean case law as opposed to statute law; or, again, it might signify the law issuing from the common law courts rather than from the Court of Chancery (that is to say equity). Thus it must be stated at the outset that ‘common law’ for the purposes of this contribution will be taken to mean the legal tradition encompassing the legal systems of the United Kingdom (except Scotland), the United States and the Commonwealth countries. However the main emphasis will be on English law.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.