Edited by Jan M. Smits
Privacy possessed for many years an uncertain status in English common law, while legislative protection for privacy interests remains piecemeal and limited. However, the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into UK law via the Human Rights Act 1998, and in particular of Article 8 of the Convention with its protection of a right to personal privacy, has triggered a ‘mini-revolution’ in this area of law. Under the influence of the Strasbourg jurisprudence, English tort law now provides a tort remedy for breach of privacy, but its ambit remains controversial and open to debate. In the absence of a written constitution, no constitutional right to privacy exists in English law. In addition, and in interesting contrast to many US jurisdictions, no cause of action for breach of privacy was historically recognised to exist in the English common law, as confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Kaye v. Robertson  FSR 62 and the House of Lords in R v. Wainwright  UKHL 53. However, a combination of legislative provisions and common law developments came gradually over time to confer a degree of indirect protection upon privacy interests.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.