The World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Human Rights
Show Less

The World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Human Rights

Developing Standards of Transparency, Participation and Accountability

Sanae Fujita

The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank are two of the world’s major institutions conducting development projects. Both banks recognize the importance of transparency, participation and accountability. Responding to criticisms and calls for reform, they have developed policies that are designed to protect these values for people affected by their projects. This original and timely book examines these policies, including those recently revised, through the prism of human rights, and makes suggestions for further improvement. It also analyzes the development of the Banks’ stance to human rights in general.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content


Developing Standards of Transparency, Participation and Accountability

Sanae Fujita


The World Bank and ADB are powerful institutions and their operations have enormous influence over people in recipient countries, as high- lighted in Chapter 5. Actions by these institutions have a direct impact on people’s human rights and as a result, they should be held accountable, although current international human rights law does not provide any adequate mechanism for this purpose. Human rights standards are currently addressed to States, but these banks have comparable power to States over people’s lives. The author submits that human rights standards should therefore be extended to apply to IFIs. As mentioned in Chapter 1, campaigners have criticised the IFIs and called for greater transparency, democratic decision-making and accountability. This arises from the general realisation that these institutions are extremely influential and as such, there is an urgent need for democratic control of their power. In response to such criticism, the attitude of the World Bank to human rights has been developing, albeit gradually, over the last 50 years. The Bank used to avoid discussion on human rights, but now it has become more open to debate on such issues, perhaps because it can no longer ignore criticism about its activities. Nevertheless, the Bank has taken some important steps to respond: one such step is the establishment of the Inspection Panel (discussed in detail earlier in this book) which is one of the positive outcomes as a result of calls for greater accountability for IFIs towards those people most affected by its policies.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.