International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume II
Show Less

International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume II

Competition, Spatial Location of Economic Activity and Financial Issues

Edited by Miroslav N. Jovanović

With this Handbook, Miroslav Jovanović has provided readers with both an excellent stand-alone original reference book as well as an integral part of a comprehensive three-volume set. This introduction into a rich and expanding academic and practical world of international economic integration also provides a theoretical and analytical framework to the reader, presenting select analytical studies and encouraging further research.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: Asymmetric Shocks and Monetary Disintegration: The Case of the Eurozone

Franco Praussello


Franco Praussello 1 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS The tenth birthday of the European monetary integration, with its institutional superstructure, the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), has been greeted by one of the worst recessions since the Great Depression of the last century. Disturbances induced by the downturn have tested the resilience of the new monetary structures, producing one of the not so frequent cases in which economic developments create a ‘laboratory’ for testing the validity of some economic conjectures, in this instance mainly the theory of optimum currency areas (OCAs), on which such a structure has been based. Indeed, the economic crisis could be thought of as the occurrence of a major asymmetric shock hitting in a country-specific way the different economies included in the eurozone. One of the main propositions of OCA theory is that the monetary authority of the European Union (EU), that is, within EMU, the European Central Bank (ECB), could not offset the negative consequences of a country-specific disturbance, which therefore had to be adjusted by mechanisms other than the monetary and exchange rate policies, such as flexibility of the labour market, mobility of the workforce, and public or private insurance tools, reducing the costs for the damaged country in terms of income loss and higher unemployment. Since in the case of EMU such mechanisms were weak or even straightforwardly absent there was the risk of fostering divergences among member countries, jeopardising the long-term survival of the eurozone. One of the clearest alarm bells signalling the danger was...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.