Gender, Development and Disasters
Show Less

Gender, Development and Disasters

Sarah Bradshaw

Sarah Bradshaw critically examines key notions, such as gender, vulnerability, risk, and humanitarianism, underpinning development and disaster discourse. Case studies are used to demonstrate how disasters are experienced individually and collectively as gendered events. Through consideration of processes to engender development, it problematizes women’s inclusion in disaster response and reconstruction. The study highlights that while women are now central to both disaster response and development, tackling gender inequality is not. By critically reflecting on gendered disaster response and the gendered impact of disasters on processes of development, it exposes some important lessons for future policy.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: What is a disaster?

Sarah Bradshaw


The focus of this book is on disasters. Whilst seemingly a straightforward concept, and an objective fact, what constitutes a disaster is based on subjective understandings and experiences of an event, which differ between people and across time and space. This chapter explores how disasters have been understood and defined. It highlights that, while represented as a scientific phenomenon, unlike the natural hazards that may provoke them, disasters are actually socially constructed. A hazard need not become, or be seen to be, a disaster. Vulnerability has emerged as a key concept to help explain how and why natural events have severe negative socio-economic outcomes or become ‘disasters’ for some groups of people and not others; that is, why some groups are more at risk than others. However, even identifying those ‘at risk’ is not straightforward, since risk is also a highly subjective notion and, while experts may define individuals or countries as ‘at risk’, this risk may not be perceived in the same way by them. In particular, the Third World has been constructed as at risk of, and vulnerable to, disasters due to its lack of development. In turn, when disasters occur they are seen as setting back the development achieved to date in these countries. This suggests disasters are something unusual and outside the normal processes of development. This chapter seeks to problematise this conceptualisation of disasters as extraordinary, and suggests that disasters need to be understood as part of the development process and thus mainstreamed within development.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.