Private Enforcement of Antitrust
Show Less

Private Enforcement of Antitrust

Regulating Corporate Behaviour through Collective Claims in the EU and US

Arianna Andreangeli

Through the expert assessment of the US federal courts’ case on competition law, alongside that of domestic Europe, Arianna Andreangeli provides a fresh response to the issues surrounding collective litigation. The discussion is skillfully placed in the wider context of competition enforcement, whilst at the same time exploring both past and present trends. The book concludes that collective litigation of competition claims must strike a “fair balance” between respecting rules of due process and ensuring fuller access to justice.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: The EU Commission agenda on collective redress: from a “sector specific” to a mainstream discussion of “group justice” questions

Arianna Andreangeli


The previous section outlined the key issues characterizing the debate on the possibility of devising a “European class action” remedy in the field of competition law. It was argued that the “effectiveness” rationale at the basis of the Crehan damages remedy may make it certainly desirable, if not altogether essential, to introduce measures designed to facilitate the “aggregation” of numerous negative value claims into a large claim to be litigated by representation. It was also emphasized that in doing so, a “fair balance” should be struck between the demands of full access to justice and of the right to a “fair trial” and the public interest in the efficient and sound administration of justice. As was aptly put by Mulheron, rather than looking for “perfect” solutions, each legal system should strive towards the identification of a “proportionate” response to these concerns, taking into account the different and often diverging interests and demands of each litigation system. As was anticipated in Chapter 1, reinforcing private litigation in the field of competition law in the EU has represented an ongoing concern for the Commission, who over the years has proposed the introduction of wide-ranging reforms, designed to harmonize the litigation rules applicable to these cases across the Union.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.