Edited by Luigino Bruni and Stefano Zamagni
Chapter 10: Do dictator games measure altruism?
As communism once haunted Europe according to the Communist Manifesto, so does the dictator game haunt the hallways, if not of Europe, of the standard consensus in behavioral and experimental research as developed in the last 20 years or so. Grand claims on the significance of this game for altruism and for the relevance of a wide array of social factors in studying dictator games have been made and developed in what has been a successful cottage industry of academic research in economics; at least, successful in terms of its ability in getting published (e.g., for recent Econometrica and European Economic Review examples, see Andreoni and Berheim, 2009, and Servatka, 2009, respectively). This chapter considers briefly whether dictator games are a good tool to measure altruism. The answer is negative: behavior in dictator games is seriously confounded by what I shall label experimenter demand effects (Zizzo, 2010). The following section briefly defines dictator games and reviews some of its purported enduring appeal. The last section criticizes dictator games as a measure of altruism and concludes by considering whether a role for dictator games can still be found that may be of relevance for the economics of philanthropy.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.