Edited by Luigino Bruni and Stefano Zamagni
Chapter 23: Mutualism
Mutualism or mutuality has at least three meanings. At the highest level, it is a doctrine according to which individual and collective wellbeing can be obtained only by common action. It is the operational content of the third principle of modern societies – fraternity – which prevents the first principle – liberty – from undermining the second principle – equality. Mutuality can be seen as the sense of common citizenship that leads people to limit their liberty and accept a certain amount of basic equality conditions among citizens (Halsey, 1978). Mutualism provides the long run stability and cohesion of modern societies, helping to overcome the ‘collective goods’ problem specified by the rational choice theorists. The word seems to have being used in the 1820s more or less at the same time by Charles Fourier in France, John Gray in Britain and some of the American friendly societies and was often employed by the non-Marxist socialists like Proudhon and the American Clarence Lee Swartz, author of a famous book on mutualism (Swartz, 1927), in which he writes in favour of private property and against communism. For this reason, often mutualism was advocated by the so-called ‘libertarian left’, but not only by this school of thought, and does contain a more or less extended critique of capitalism as an economic system that does not embody either equality or fraternity, a critique that does not prevent mutualists when they form an enterprise from staying in the market and competing with capitalists.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.