The Shape of the Division of Labour
Show Less

The Shape of the Division of Labour

Nations, Industries and Households

  • The Cournot Centre series

Edited by Robert M. Solow and Jean-Philippe Touffut

How is work divided up in the household, within an industry, a nation or between continents? What are the dynamics of the division of labour? The wide-ranging contributions to this book explore these questions from technological, capital and political perspectives. They include in-depth studies of gender, the firm, countries’ economic specializations, ICTs, foreign direct investment and agriculture. In this book, ten distinguished contributors – economists, scholars and practitioners – take stock of the shape of the division of labour and provide useful policy recommendations.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 5: How Integrated are Chinese and Indian Labour into the World Economy?

Richard N. Cooper

Extract

5. How integrated are Chinese and Indian labour into the world economy? Richard N. Cooper Wages of the median and of unskilled workers have stagnated during the past decade in many rich countries, including the United States, even while economic growth remained robust until 2008. At the same time, corporate profits excelled. An explanation for these widespread phenomena is that the effective world labour supply was greatly increased by the integration of China and India – the world’s two most populous countries – into the global economy as a result of changes in policy in both of those countries, giving encouragement to greater engagement with the rest of the world. Between them, China and India are said to have added over a billion workers to world labour supply, without a corresponding increase in the capital stock. Simple neoclassical economics would suggest a rise in returns to capital and a fall in wages of unskilled workers in the rest of the world. (To these two countries could be added the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and Vietnam, but the numbers of potential workers there are less dramatic, and skill levels higher; the focus here will be on China and India.) China and India are similar in many ways. Both are populous, physically large, socially diversified, economically poor countries. In 1978 they had roughly the same per capita GDP in terms of purchasing power parity (Maddison, 2001, p. 304). Their labour forces have very different characteristics, however. A significantly higher fraction of China’s population...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.