The Shape of the Division of Labour
Show Less

The Shape of the Division of Labour

Nations, Industries and Households

Edited by Robert M. Solow and Jean-Philippe Touffut

How is work divided up in the household, within an industry, a nation or between continents? What are the dynamics of the division of labour? The wide-ranging contributions to this book explore these questions from technological, capital and political perspectives. They include in-depth studies of gender, the firm, countries’ economic specializations, ICTs, foreign direct investment and agriculture. In this book, ten distinguished contributors – economists, scholars and practitioners – take stock of the shape of the division of labour and provide useful policy recommendations.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: The Changing Sexual Division of Labour

Shelly Lundberg


* Shelly Lundberg Man may work from sun to sun, But woman’s work is never done. (Saying) In the United States, considerable media attention has been focused on the possibility that, as employment continued to fall in the autumn of 2009, the proportion of non-farm payroll jobs held by women could exceed 50 per cent. If this reversal of male–female employment patterns occurs, it will be a transitory one. Women’s employment has been less sensitive to the business cycle than men’s, and the current recession has had a particularly devastating impact on male-dominated industries such as manufacturing and construction.1 A female majority in the US workforce is unlikely, therefore, to survive an economic recovery but, all the same, a milestone in the gender division of labour in the market will have been reached. The economic lives of men and women are converging – more slowly in some countries than in others, but inexorably. In almost all societies, from hunter-gatherer communities to postindustrial economies, task assignment is gender specialized. The early care and nourishment of children are always in the women’s sphere, and there has been considerable controversy in the social sciences as to how much of the sexual division of labour is determined by reproductive biology rather than social or cultural processes. A number of economists have constructed models that show how sex differences, including initial maternal investments in children and differential fecundity, can interact with constraints in the market and the household to produce distinct economic roles for men and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.