Technology, Natural Resources and Economic Growth
Show Less

Technology, Natural Resources and Economic Growth

Improving the Environment for a Greener Future

Shunsuke Managi

Through a combination of global data analysis and focused country level analysis, this timely book provides answers to the most pertinent country and industry specific questions defining the current relationship between technology, natural resources and economic growth.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Policy-induced Competitiveness in the United States

Shunsuke Managi


INTRODUCTION Over the past 60 years we have greatly improved our understanding of the process of technological innovation. We have progressed from ‘confessions of ignorance’, where time is the only ‘explanatory’ variable in technological progress, towards a better understanding of the mechanisms that drive productivity change and improved measurements of various components of productivity change (Managi et al., 2004). Technological progress and productivity increase play a key role in the solution of environmental problems in the face of these increasingly stringent environmental regulations (Akao and Managi, 2007). Therefore, environmental policy needs to be properly designed to promote technological innovation, and to favor its diffusion (Kneese and Schultze, 1978; Jaffe et al., 2002). There has been some debate over whether environmental regulations have played a major causal role in impairing the competitiveness of industries. Conventional wisdom says that environmental regulations impose significant costs to industry and slow productivity growth and impede technological progress (Jorgenson and Wilcoxen, 1990; Portney, 1994; Jaffe et al., 1995; Palmer et al., 1995). Within this context, the key issue is how to design environmental regulations to attain environmental goals while controlling the adverse impact on industry to the extent feasible, that is, minimizing productivity loss. Recently, however, revisionists propose the alternative hypothesis that environmental regulations can have a positive effect on competitiveness in the industry. Environmental regulations pressure firms to innovate and thus enhance growth and competitiveness, this is called the ‘Porter hypothesis’ (Porter, 1991; Porter and van der Linde, 1995).1 While there are market failures...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.