The First Great Recession of the 21st Century
Show Less

The First Great Recession of the 21st Century

Competing Explanations

Edited by Óscar Dejuán, Eladio Febrero and Maria Cristina Marcuzzo

The 2008–10 financial crisis and the global recession it created is a complex phenomenon that warrants detailed examination. The various essays in this book utilise several alternative paradigms to provide a plausible explanation and a credible cure. Great detail is given to this important analysis from different theoretical perspectives, presenting a clearer understanding of what went wrong and expounding misinterpretations of current theories and practices.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Epic Recession and Economic Theory

Jack Rasmus


Jack Rasmus In a gathering a few weeks ago in Cambridge, UK, economists and financial practitioners met to begin the attempt to forge a new paradigm for economics. That gathering, the inaugural session of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, held 8–11 April 2010, reflected the view that ideas follow changes in real events – at least economic ideas and qualitative shifts in real events. The real change, of course, is the global financial crisis that, after nearly three decades of periodic, partial eruptions and temporary containment, imploded globally in late 2007. The implosion precipitated in turn a major contraction in non-financial sectors of the global economy in 2008. That contraction still continues to evolve in the wake of the cataclysmic economic events of 2007–09. However, prevailing mainstream economic theory continues to fail to predict the evolution of such events, just as it failed to predict their origins and eruption. With a lag behind both the financial and real events, it has now become increasingly clear that the old post-1945 paradigm of economic thought has also collapsed. That paradigm collapse is not just a matter of the discrediting of ‘efficient market hypothesis’ (EMH). The collapse of EMH is just one expression of a more fundamental crisis at the root of contemporary economic theory in both of its major wings, which this writer has called ‘Hybrid Keynesianism’ and ‘Retro-Classicalism’. The crisis is ultimately the consequence of that paradigm’s faulty theory of price, a too narrow definition of investment, a misunderstanding...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.