Moving Beyond the Impasse
Edited by James Meadowcroft, Oluf Langhelle and Audun Ruud
Chapter 7: Moving beyond the impasse: climate change activism in the US and the EU
This volume is dedicated to William Lafferty’s work on democracy and sustainable development governance. It pays particular attention to Lafferty’s desire to move beyond the impasse and to discover ways to enact effective environmental policy. This chapter seeks to engage with this theme by examining environmental activism (defined here as concerted, active engagement with an environmental issue or campaign intended to bring about political or social change) in two liberal pluralist democracies: the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). The chapter compares how societal actors–mainly environmental NGOs but also other actors engaged with environmental themes–have responded to the challenges presented by climate change and the governance issues it raises. In particular it seeks to identify the institutional constraints blocking effective mobilization and activists’ efforts to overcome them. The impetus for a focus on activism arises in great part from questions raised by Lafferty and his colleagues’ work on democracy and sustainable development governance (Lafferty 1996; 2004a; 2004b; 2004c; Lundquist 2004; Meadowcroft 2004). Following Lafferty, the term governance is defined here as established patterns of rules and norms steering a polity in a stipulated direction. Lafferty suggests that some of the greatest challenges of modern governance are related to the nature of contemporary democracy itself. He is concerned above all with how democratic values and democratic decision-making can be maintained while pursuing a goal (such as sustainable development) characterized by compelling urgency, devilish complexity and long-term commitment (Lafferty 2004b, p. 20ff). I suggest here the same imperatives apply to the challenge of climate change and efforts to address it. More generally I argue that insights from Lafferty’s study of sustainable development governance–especially its transformative character–can help us probe challenges and prospects of climate change governance.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.