Research Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulation
Show Less

Research Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulation

Edited by Julian Burling and Kevin Lazarus

Given its economic importance, insurance is a field that has been underserved as an area of academic study. This detailed book provides much needed coverage of insurance law and regulation in its international context.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Pre-contractual Information Duties: The Insured’s Pre-Contractual Duty of Disclosure – Convergence Across the Jurisdictional Divide

John Lowry


John Lowry 1. INTRODUCTION This chapter examines the pre-contract duty of disclosure borne by proposers for insurance. It traverses the English law on non-disclosure and misrepresentation as a means of setting the backdrop against which divergences of approach in the USA, Australia and Germany can be assessed. A particular focus of the chapter lies not merely on the deficiencies of the current law but is also directed towards examining reform proposals across the jurisdictions, together with recent legislative developments in the UK and Germany. It will be demonstrated that a remarkable degree of consensus has emerged across the jurisdictional divide with respect to the scope of the insured’s duty not to conceal or misrepresent facts material to the underwriting of risk. While non-disclosure and misrepresentation are distinct defences to a claim, they are frequently treated as one and the same thing by the English courts,1 no doubt because of the common practice of insurers raising both by way of defence to a claim. Nondisclosure is concerned with the insured’s duty to volunteer material facts, while misrepresentation concerns the insured’s duty to answer the insurer’s questions (generally contained in proposal forms) accurately and to ensure that any statement volunteered is true. The difficulty in drawing a bright line between non-disclosure and misrepresentation in insurance contracts can be seen in relation to an insured’s failure to answer a specific question raised by the insurer. Such failure, in English law, will be deemed to be a negative answer, that...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.