Conflict of Laws in the People’s Republic of China
Show Less

Conflict of Laws in the People’s Republic of China

Zheng Sophia Tang, Yongping Xiao and Zhengxin Huo

The area of conflict of laws in China has undergone fundamental development in the past three decades and the most recent changes in the 2010s, regarding both jurisdiction and choice of law rules, mark the establishment of modern Chinese conflicts system. Jointly written by three professors from both China and the UK, this book provides the most up-to-date and comprehensive analysis of Chinese conflict of laws in civil and commercial matters. It takes into account the latest developments in legislation and judicial interpretation, case law and judicial practice, and historical, political and economic background, especially recognizing the scholarly contribution made by Chinese scholars to this field.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content


Zheng Sophia Tang, Yongping Xiao and Zhengxin Huo


There are three groups of thought on the nature of conflict of laws: universalism, particularism and dualism. Universalism insists on the uniform, universal and obligatory norms that private international law imposes to all states in the world. Friedrich Carl von Savigny and Pasquale Stanislao Mancini are the leading advocates. Particularism is represented by Albert Venn Dicey and Martin Wolff, holding each state creates its own private international law norms pursuing its own policy, making private international law domestic law instead of international law. Duralists include Ernest Zitelmann and Rudolf Bystricky, who believe that private international law regulates both domestic and international legal relations whose sources include not only domestic law but also international conventions and custom; therefore, private international law is both internal and international in nature. Chinese scholars approach this issue from the perspective of historical materialism believing in an evolutionary process, by virtue of which private international law has been progressing from internal law to international law. In the earlier period private international law comprised conflicts rules only in domestic legislation; in other words, private international law undoubtedly originated from internal law in nature. Only after the nineteenth century, when international conventions and custom gradually became the sources of private international law, did scholars have disagreements on the nature of the discipline. Based on the historic background, the discipline depends on the specific stage where private international law is situated now in its evolutionary process.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.