The Financial Crisis and the Regulation of Finance
Show Less

The Financial Crisis and the Regulation of Finance

Edited by Christopher J. Green, Eric J. Pentecost and Tom Weyman-Jones

The 2007–08 financial crisis has posed substantial challenges for bankers, economists and regulators: was it preventable, and how can such crises be avoided in future? This book addresses these questions. The Financial Crisis and the Regulation of Finance includes a comprehensive overview of the crisis and reviews the theory and practise of regulation in the UK and worldwide. The contributors – all international experts on financial markets and regulation – provide perspectives and analysis on macro-prudential regulation, the regulation of financial firms, and the role of shareholders and disclosure.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Implementing the Macroprudential Approach to Financial Regulation and Supervision

Claudio Borio


Claudio Borio INTRODUCTION1 Banking and regulatory issues have always been central to David Llewellyn’s illustrious career as an academic, policy advisor and public servant. He has proved to be a particularly acute observer of trends in the banking industry (Llewellyn, 1999a). Above all, he always explored those trends not in the abstract, but with the objective of deriving implications for public policy. It is this natural inclination to pursue the public interest, I think, that explains his strong focus on regulation and supervision (Llewellyn, 1986, 1999b and Goodhart et al., 1998). In analysing these issues and in drawing policy prescriptions, Llewellyn’s trademark has been a distinct and effortless mix of intellectual rigour and British pragmatism. We have all learnt a lot from him. In what follows, I develop some reflections on a theme in regulation and supervision that has come to prominence in the wake of the recent financial crisis. Recent international reports have recommended that financial regulatory and supervisory frameworks strengthen their macroprudential orientation (G20, 2009 and de Larosière et al., 2009). The term has become so well accepted that, paraphrasing Milton Friedman, one could say that ‘we are all macroprudentialists now’. And yet, a decade ago, the term was barely used and it would have been hard for supervisors to recognise that their tasks involved a significant macroprudential dimension, let alone that it would have been desirable to strengthen it. In fact, the term is not new. At the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), its usage goes...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.