Modern Cost–Benefit Analysis of Hydropower Conflicts
Show Less

Modern Cost–Benefit Analysis of Hydropower Conflicts

Edited by Per-Olov Johansson and Bengt Kriström

This important book sheds light on the ways in which modern tools of welfare economics can be used to assess the benefits and costs of resource conflicts involving hydropower. The chapters highlight key methodological issues in this area; ranging from the intersection between cost–benefit analysis and behavioral economics, to the value of load balancing services provided by hydropower. The inclusion of insights from expert contributors from both sides of the Atlantic brings a unique and interesting range of viewpoints to the work.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Environmental Cost–Benefit Analysis and Water Quality Management

Nick Hanley


Nick Hanley INTRODUCTION 1 Some of the earliest applications of cost–benefit analysis (CBA) in an environmental policy context concerned the management of water resources (Banzhaf, 2009). The desire by policy-makers, politicians, regulators and guardians of the public purse to have some sense of the efficiency with which public money was being spent on water resource management in the US led to a desire to compare the economic benefits and costs of individual projects (such as new dams). This way of thinking about the economic rationality of public spending was later extended to the UK, where the use of CBA in project appraisal in the 1970s was later extended to aspects of environmental policy analysis (DoE, 1991; Turner, 2005). Environmental CBA thinking also found its way into management strategies for public forests, with the non-market benefits of forestry increasingly being incorporated into investment analysis (Willis et al., 2003). In Europe, the main policy within which CBA is now applied to water issues is the Water Framework Directive. The Water Framework Directive is a unifying measure passed by the European Union to harmonize water resource management, and to achieve a default target of ‘Good Ecological Status’ (GES) for all surface waters in the European Union (EU). GES is defined with respect to biological, chemical and morphological criteria. River basins are the focus for management actions, and it is in the drafting of ‘River Basin Management Plans’ that CBA comes into play. National agencies must identify cost-effective programmes of measures for each...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.