Agglomeration, Clusters and Entrepreneurship
Show Less

Agglomeration, Clusters and Entrepreneurship

Studies in Regional Economic Development

  • New Horizons in Regional Science series

Edited by Charlie Karlsson, Börje Johansson and Roger R. Stough

Regional economic development has experienced considerable dynamism over recent years. Perhaps the most notable cases were the rise of China and India to emergent country status by the turn of the millennium. With time now for hindsight, this book identifies some of the key forces behind these development successes, namely agglomeration, clusters and entrepreneurship.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 2: Differentials in endogenous regional employment growth in US metropolitan areas: the role of entrepreneurship and other leadership and institutional factors

Robert J. Stimson, Roger R. Stough, Tung-Kai Shyy and Chunpu Song

Extract

Numerous writers refer to economic development as both a process and a product or outcome (see, for example, Blakely, 1994; Stimson et al. 2006b). It is certainly a multi-dimensional phenomenon, involving many actors and influenced by many factors. It also seems to defy precise definition, being seen to incorporate both quantitative and qualitative dimensions. The study of regional economic development is concerned not only with analysis and modeling but also policy and strategy that may facilitate regional development process as well as regional change. The process of regional economic development is certainly dynamic. Over time, various approaches to theorizing about regional economic development and to modeling regional growth have evolved. Traditional regional economic development approaches are based on neo-classical economic growth theory and heavily influenced by the Solow (1956; 2000) model. These have been replaced over the last 3 decades by a suite of arguments and models commonly known as the new growth theory, which focus on endogenous factors and processes. This orientation is seen in the writings of many economists, including Romer (1986; 1990), Lucas (1988), Barro (1990), Grossman and Helpman (1991), Rebelo (1991) and Arthur (1994). An early focus of the new growth theory was on technical progress as it generates economic development, as exemplified in the work of Rees (1979) and Malecki (1991).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.