Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, Second Edition
Show Less

Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, Second Edition

Edited by Peter Dauvergne

The second edition of this Handbook contains more than 30 new and original articles as well as six essential updates by leading scholars of global environmental politics. This landmark book maps the latest theoretical and empirical research in this energetic and growing field. Captured here are the pioneering and lively debates over concerns for the health of the planet and how they might best be addressed.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 21: Exploring Global Governance from a Critical Global Political Economy Perspective

Gabriela Kütting


Gabriela Kütting The starting point of my argument put forward in this chapter is situated in the discipline of international relations (IR) and the place of global environmental politics (GEP) within it. Both the discourses on global governance (GG) and on GEP (as well as on global environmental governance: GEG) generally pay little attention to the unequal distribution of resources (or at least not as a main or guiding principle) and of unequal consumption patterns – nor do they include the notion of “giving up,” consuming less or sacrificing something for better governance or for environmental improvement. This normative concern is not within the parameters of the issue area of the mainstream discipline. There are several reasons why this is the case and they will be discussed here. The main concern of this chapter is to discuss how GEG and considerations of consumption but also of global equity need to be brought together and how the one needs to consider the other for a more normative GEG discourse – but also one that takes into consideration issues that most environmental writers agree need to be at the forefront of political concerns in the twenty-first century. First of all, both GEP and GG are primarily concerned with the relations between political actors and the structure within which they operate. They see institutions as the main social force both as causes of change and as prescriptions for solving problems.1 But as Haas2 puts it: What is needed is a clearer map of the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.