International Trade and Economic Growth in Open Economies
Show Less

International Trade and Economic Growth in Open Economies

The Classical Dynamics of Hume, Smith, Ricardo and Malthus

John Berdell

In this enlightening book, John Berdell addresses the widely-held belief that classical economics distanced itself from policy issues and public debates regarding the effects of international trade on economic growth in advanced economies. He argues, through a detailed consideration of the evolution and structure of Hume’s, Smith’s, Ricardo’s and Malthus’ analyses, that it is not only contemporary international economic theory which takes account of these issues.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: The Present Relevance of Hume’s Open Economy Monetary Dynamics

John Berdell


5 The Present Relevance of Hume’s Open Economy Monetary Dynamics I Doctrines and Dynamics Hume’s seminal formulation of the quantity theory of money within a startlingly efficient automatic mechanism of international adjustment has ensured that his text remains a touchstone for monetary economists. If his right to a place within the development of monetary theory is not in question, his exact placement is under considerable dispute. He has been claimed as precursor to monetary, monetarist, and post-Keynesian analysis. Frenkel and J o h m o n (1976) accorded Hume an important role in the historical origins of the monetary approach to the balance of payments. Friedman’s (1987) exposition of the quantity theory of money continues to prominently cite Hume’s essays, while Perlman (1987) has recently advanced a textual and analytical analysis of Hume which finds him firmly in support of only transient effects of money on real income. In Keynes’s ([1936] 1964, 343n) view, however, Hume kept ‘half a foot’ outside the ‘classical’ world by remaining sensitive to the disequilibrium output effects of monetary adjustment. Indeed, Kregel (1 989) has argued that Hume’s proper place in the history of monetary theory is as a precursor to the post-Keynesian analysis of inflation and incomes policies developed by Sydney Weintraub. Where does Hume belong within the history of‘monetary theory, and what can we learn from the persistent coexistence of such divergent interpretations? In pursuit of these questions :[ present a model and interpretation which provides one avenue for accurately and consistently situating...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.