Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics
Show Less

Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics

Edited by Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh

This major reference book comprises specially commissioned surveys in environmental and resource economics written by an international team of experts. Authoritative yet accessible, each entry provides a state-of-the-art summary of key areas that will be invaluable to researchers, practitioners and advanced students.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 65: Evolution, Environment and Economics

J.M. Gowdy


JohnM. Gowdy 1. Introduction: evolutionary biology and economics The connections between evolutionary theory and economics go back well over one hundred years. The co-formulators of the theory of evolution by natural selection, Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace, developed their ideas after reading the economic texts of Thomas Malthus describing competitive markets. Alfred Marshall, the great synthesizer of modern neoclassical economics in the early 19OOs, had a keen interest in evolutionary theory. He used Darwin’s dictum natura non facit saltum, nature does not make leaps, for the frontispiece of his economic textbook. We find in Darwin and Marshall the two ideas which dominated both evolutionary and economic theory for over a century - improvement through competition and gradual change. More important than Darwin to contemporary economics were the ideas of Herbert Spencer who greatly influenced Marshall and Veblen. It was Spencer, not Darwin, who used the term ‘evolution’ (Darwin preferred the more neutral and accurate phrase ‘descent with modification’) and who coined the phrase ‘survival of the fittest’ (Hodgson, 1993). The Spencerian idea of social progress through competition still dominates contemporary thought. To this day neoclassical models of economic change begin with the assumption that the sole driving evolutionary force is competitive selection (see, for example, the explicit statements of this by Geroski, 1989; Telser, 1996). Until recently, most of the applications of biological metaphors’ in economics were confined to crude notions of survival of the fittest which were used to validate the main results of neoclassical economic theory, namely,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.