The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics

Edited by Jürgen G. Backhaus

This authoritative and comprehensive reference work introduces the reader to the major concepts and leading contributors in the field of law and economics. The Companion features accessible, informative and provocative entries on all the significant areas and breaks new ground by bringing together widely dispersed but theoretically congruent ideas for the first time.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 15: Environmental law and economics

A. Allan Schmid


A. Allan Schmid Law and economics has two contrasting approaches. One aspires to provide not only a positive theory of economic behaviour but also a guide to legaleconomic policy choices. Efficiency and maximization of net economic product is claimed to be that guide (Faure, 1995). The second provides only a substantive description of the impacts of legal alternatives on different parties, with little attempt to aggregate them. These approaches will be contrasted with respect to several major legal questions concerning the environment, including the choice of injunction or liability as relief to injury, externalities and ownership, use of markets versus governmental regulation, and the takings issue. These will illustrate some of the theoretical and empirical findings in the environmental law and economics literature. What is the appropriate relief when an actor causes environmental injury to another? The case of Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. (Court of Appeals of New York, 1970, 26 N.Y. 2nd 219, 257 N.E. 2nd 870) is often used to illustrate the problem (see Goetz, 1984). A large cement plant created smoke, dirt and vibration which damaged neighbours. The court found that the activity created a nuisance and awarded damages, but not an injunction. Cooter and Ulen (1988) argue that law and economics can provide an authoritative answer to the desirability of damages versus an injunction which legal analysis alone cannot. The landmark literature here is Calabresi and Melamed (1972) and Polinsky (1980). The authors argued that efficiency points to the awarding of damages to the many...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.