Economic Growth and Change
Show Less

Economic Growth and Change National and Regional Patterns of Convergence and Divergence

National and Regional Patterns of Convergence and Divergence

Edited by John Adams and Francesco Pigliaru

The pursuit of economic growth is at the top of every nation’s policy agenda at the end of the 20th century. This authoritative and comprehensive book goes beyond the narrowly-based convergence model of economic growth by considering global, national and regional patterns of growth from a comparative perspective.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: On the economic rise and decline of nations

Dennis C. Mueller

Extract

Page 15  1. On the economic rise and decline of nations  Dennis C. Mueller  The idea that nations rise and decline calls to mind the grander hypotheses that civilizations or cultures rise and decline as put forward by Oswald Spengler (1922,  1923) and Arnold Toynbee (1946, 1957). The rise and decline of the great civilizations and empires is to a considerable degree a history of military conquest and then  defeat. As Paul Kennedy (1987) has demonstrated for the last half of the millennium, a military rise and decline is inevitably also a story of economic rise and decline,  but there is clearly much more involved than economics. Moreover, in some cases, as with the Ottoman Empire, the story seems to be largely one of military superiority  and inferiority, of governmental efficiency in running a military state, with economic prowess clearly taking a back seat (Fernández­Armesto, 1995, pp. 239–1, 379– 80).  Other factors beyond economic and military strength may also have played important roles in the fortunes of past empires. Toynbee (1946, 1957) emphasized the  contribution of religious zeal and religious decay, Spengler (1922, 1923) described a process of general cultural decline. I am an economist, and my comparative  advantage in the study of history does not fall in the areas of military, cultural and religious history. Indeed, most historians would probably argue that economists are  particularly ill­trained and ill­suited to the study of culture and religion. I shall therefore mostly confine myself to the question...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.