Economic Growth and Change
Show Less

Economic Growth and Change

National and Regional Patterns of Convergence and Divergence

Edited by John Adams and Francesco Pigliaru

The pursuit of economic growth is at the top of every nation’s policy agenda at the end of the 20th century. This authoritative and comprehensive book goes beyond the narrowly-based convergence model of economic growth by considering global, national and regional patterns of growth from a comparative perspective.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Does sovereignty matter for economis growth? An analysis of growth rates between 1870 and 1950

M. Shahid Alam


Page 46  2. Does sovereignty matter for economic growth? An analysis of growth rates between 1870 and 1950   M. Shahid Alam  INTRODUCTION*  This chapter explores the connections between sovereignty and the growth record of lagging countries over the two centuries leading up to the 1950s. It combines  theory and empirics to show that sovereignty was a powerful force driving the polarization of the global economy during this period.  The first phase of the industrial epoch ending in the 1950s was characterized by (i) international integration of markets, (ii) concentration of manufactures in a small  number of advanced countries, (iii) rising global disparities and (iv) centralization of power in the advanced countries.1 Although these stylized facts are not  controversial, not all of them are acknowledged by orthodox or dissenting accounts of the global economy. Orthodox analyses of the global economy accommodate  only the first and second stylized facts; their prediction that integration will lead to all round growth being at variance with the third. Dissenting economists incorporate  the first, second and third stylized facts but leave out the fourth; they generally claim that rising disparities were caused by integration of markets. This chapter takes  explicit account of all four stylized facts. It argues that the patterns of global integration and growth during phase one of the industrial epoch were intimately connected  to the spatial concentration of manufactures and power. When two economies at unequal levels of development were freely integrated, they moved further apart in  terms of levels of development. Sovereign...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.